|
TITLE PAGE
DEDICATION &
INTENT OF THE AUTHOR
OUTLINE OF REPORT
INTRODUCTION—A WAY OF LIFE
EGYPT TODAY
THE NILE RIVER
CHAPTER 1 ANCIENT EGYPT
CHAPTER 2 MUHAMMED ALI
CHAPTER 3 POLICIES IN 20TH
CENTURY
CHAPTER 4 CAPACITY BUILDING– NARP
CHAPTER 5 POST NARP
CHAPTER 6 RESEARCH TODAY
CHAPTER 7 AGRICULTURE AND
ECONOMICS
CHAPTER 8 AGRICULTURAL
GROWTH AND EMPLOYMENT
CHAPTER 9 EGYPT’S
FUTURE—HORTICULTURE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
|
CHAPTER 4
--Capacity Building--NARP

The National Agricultural Research Project
NARP, which operated from the
mid-1980s until the mid-1990s, represents the largest agricultural research
development project ever undertaken by USAID in Egypt, and perhaps the
largest of any in the developing world. The $205 million undertaking was
directed at improving Egypt‘s adaptation and use of modern technology to
strengthen agricultural production. (90)
In 1986, the project‘s goal
was to improve the capacity for state-of-the- art agricultural research in
Egypt. The accomplishments of the project over its eight year life span
include:
·
capacity building, human resources development, seed policy,
agricultural engineering,
·
research system improvement, research management and
administration, as well as
·
improving the capability of the agricultural research and
technology transfer system,
·
including ARC, Universities and National Research Center
(NRC).
Among NARP’s principal
accomplishments was human resource development in agricultural research.
More than 6,000 Ph.D., M.Sc. and B.Sc. holders participated in research
under NARP. In addition, 90 students obtained their Ph.D. degrees from US
universities, 20 obtained their M.Sc. degrees, and 2,150 traveled to US
universities for post-doctoral training and exchange visits. This cadre of
agricultural scientists is now serving in leadership positions in public and
private sector institutions in the agricultural sector.
The NARP project also had an
Agricultural Policy Analysis Component (APAC). Its principal objective was
to provide technical assistance to strengthen the planning, policy analysis
and monitoring capabilities of the Ministry of Agriculture and Land
Reclamation and the Ministry of Public Works and Water Resources. This was
the analytical tool used to help develop benchmarks for the policy reform
component under APCP. It therefore was one of the predecessors of later
programs such as APRP. It also built the foundation for later programs such
as Agricultural Data Collection and Analysis (ADCA).
The NARP legacy provided a
basis for a number of future USAID programs in agriculture. The best
illustrations of NARP’s achievements are that Egypt’s agricultural research
capability was enhanced, and that resulted in high yields of most crops, and
the narrowing the food gap, despite the continuous increases in population.
Accomplishments of Specific Institutes During NARP
During the
10 years of the NARP program, the institutes of the Agricultural Research
Center expanded their research programs through the support of the Egyptian
government, resources from European governments and the financial,
educational and facility support of USAID. Many of the institutes sent
members to the United States for training and scientists from the US
participated in joint research programs. This interaction enabled each
institute to accomplish the goals needed to improve the productivity of
Egypt’s agriculture.
The
following summaries of the accomplishments of several institutes was a joint
effort by the offices of Dr. Wally, Minister of Agriculture, Dr. Gomaa,
Director General of the Agricultural Research Center and the Dr. El-Beltagy,Chairman
of the Board of the Agricultural Research Center and the NARP program.
The Veterinary Serum and
Vaccine Research Institute developed new
vaccines against clostridial diseases that gave sheep and cattle a prolonged
immunity. Work on the control of epizootic diseases has lead to improved
vaccines for poultry and rabbits. Thirdly they have produced improved
antiserum against tetanus and brucella. A new system of producing a vaccine
from tissue culture cells instead of from susceptible animals improved the
control of sheep pox. Rinderpest epidemics have been a continuous threat.
The Institute has developed a recombinant vaccine and rapid diagnostic
method via new molecular biology techniques from the United States.
Training workshops on biotechnology have enabled the production of an
effective Rift Valley Fever vaccine.
The Field Crops Research
Institute focused on improving varieties on
wheat, rice, corn, barley, faba beans, soybeans, lentils and fiber and
forage crops. New varieties of rice have increased yield by 32%; corn by
70%; wheat varieties that are more tolerant to extreme heat and drought;
barley varieties with improved tolerance to a variety of environments and an
overall increase in yield of 22%; legume research focused on faba beans and
soybeans. Total production of faba beans increased by 48% due to the use of
certified seed and improved varieties. Oil crop research includes
sunflowers, sesame, peanuts and Canola. Canola was a new crop in the 1990’s
for Egypt so they collected more than 350 lines of canola from all over the
world to find varieties suitable to Egypt. The focus on sunflower and
sesame was oil quality. Research on Berseem clover, rye grass, alfalfa,
sorghum and millet focused on introducing new varieties and genetic lines to
Egypt. The most important fiber crop in Egypt is flax. New varieties have
been introduced including the very popular kenaf. Interesting too is the
expansion of sisal varieties that are being introduced to reclaim desert
soils. The Field Crops Research Institute is also responsible for weed
control research. Better knowledge of the weed varieties and appropriate
herbicides have resulted in crop production increases by as much as 30%.
The Cotton Research Institute(CRI)
is perhaps the oldest research institution in Egypt and is one of the
pioneering cotton institutions in the world. All varieties grown in Egypt
belong to the upper two international quality classes, extra long staple and
long staple. The average yield has doubled during the last 40 years.
Cultural practices have been developed for each variety and region; methods
of fiber and yarn quality evaluation have been refined. The CRI made a
special effort to improve their technology transfer capability.
The Plant Pathology Research
Institute (PPRI) has identified genes
conditioning resistance for leaf and stem rust as well as genes that confer
resistance to rusts. As a result, several high yielding varieties have been
introduced, and selection of genetic sources to smut have also been carried
out. One of the most serious diseases of corn in Egypt is late wilt caused
by Cephalosporium maydis. Resistant cultivars have been introduced
resulting in an increase in production to 3 tons per feddan. Tomato is one
of the most important vegetables in Egypt, diseases of Verticillium and
Fusarium have plagued the industry. Three new cultivars resistant to these
diseases were selected. Phytopthera has been a serious threat to tomato
and potato production often devastating the crop from 50% to 100%. New
systemic fungicides have reduced the lose to about 5%. Post harvest
management has focused on reducing the used of fungicides on edible crops to
reduce public health hazards. The use of modified atmospheric storage has
helped control molds and rots that affect post harvest storage of fruits and
vegetables and hence the ability to ship products to markets outside of
Egypt.
Virus
diseases affect numerous crops and cause huge or even total loses. By using
advanced molecular techniques such as the Elisa immuno assay and the
Octerlony technique, detection of several very serious diseases including
Barley Yellow Dwarf , Faba Bean Necrotic Yellow Virus and Tomato Yellow Leaf
Curl Virus have been made possible cooperation between the PPRI and the CRI
has lead to the development of cotton varieties with resistance to cotton
wilt with the result that there were no serious outbreaks of wilt during
this 10 year period.
Recognizing
the importance of mechanizing Egyptian agriculture, the MOA established the
Agricultural Engineering Research Institute
in 1983. (106)
The institute developed equipment using
laser techniques to improve land leveling for more efficient use of
irrigation water. They also developed equipment for efficient seed planting
and cereal crop harvesting and threshing.
The Agricultural Genetic
Engineering Research Institute (AGERI) was
established in 1989 as a commitment to develop expertise in agricultural
biotechnology. Its primary objectives were:
-
to reduce the dependency on
pesticides through the production of transgenic cotton;
-
produce transgenic potato
plants resistant to potato virus and potato leaf roll virus;
-
enhance nutritional quality
of faba beans by adding the methionine gene;
-
cloning the genes in tomato
related to stress-tolerance and disease resistance;
-
develop an efficient
regeneration and transformation system in maize to develop resistance to
corn borer insects;
-
map the genome of rapeseed
to develop varieties suitable to Egyptian conditions;
-
develop efficient diagnostic
tools for the identification of major virus diseases of crops in Egypt.
Soil and Water Research Institute (SWRI)
During the NARP years, SWRI accomplished a
series of important successes in numerous departments:
Remote sensing: Soil mapping
and classification were completed for 1.2 million feddans in the Eastern
Delta and 0.7 million fed dans in western Nubaria. An evaluation was
carried out for salt, sea and sand affected Delta soil. Changes in the
course of the River Nile, location of islands and the status of the Damietta
branch were monitored. Land-use mapping was completed for 7.5 million
feddans in Egypt.
Soil survey and studies: From 1983 to
1986, a major project on land resources resulted in revising earlier studies
on soil on both banks of the Nile Valley in Upper Egypt, the Eastern Delta
and the Suez to update soil maps.
Plant nutrition and soil fertility: SWRI surveyed the fertility of 4
million feddans and recommended supplementing rice nurseries with zinc
sulfate. This resulted in a 20-25 % increase in rice yield.
The
Agricultural Microbiology department inoculated 90% of the soybean,40% of
the peanut, 30% of the lentil and 25% of the bean acreage with Rhizobia
specific for each legume.
Because of
the problems of soil and ground water pollution with nitrates and heavy
metals, the institute established a network of more than 4000 observation
wells. Limited water supplies of water have lead to the reuse of
drainage water and the suitability of ground water was evaluated.
Water consumption of field and horticultural crops was determined. The
number of irrigation cycles for major field crops and the feasibility of reducing
water use were evaluated.
Animal
Reproduction Research Institute research has improved the reproductivity in
cattle, buffalo and sheep. Gonadatrophins were extracted from buffalo
pituitaries for diagnosis and control of ovulation in livestock. A mass
survey of reproductive diseases was conducted throughout Egypt. As a result
brucella infection has dropped from 3% to 0.25% and camplyobacteriosis from
5.3% to 0.3%. Trichmonas fetus has been eradicated. Brucellosis was
recognized as being the most devastating problem. The strict test and
slaughter program being followed has caused a drop in the disease to about
2% in Cattle and 0.9% in buffalo. In addition the test used has been
improved through the use of the ELISA system of testing. Diagnosis and
control of newborn calf diseases revealed that 10 to 15% of newborn calves
die during the first two weeks of age due to diarrhea, respiratory
infections and mismanagement. Treatment with specific and non-specific
immune stimulants and the isolation and identification of bacterial and
viral agents causing enteritis and pneumonia using ELISA have been effective
in reducing loss. Fundamental research on the freezability of buffalo semen
with the result that the conception rate increased by 60%. Similarly in
sheep the use of improved artificial insemination has improved wool and
mutton production and the conception has improved from 56 % to 77%.
Animal
Health Research Institute (AHRI) was designated as the national institution
responsible for the preservation of animal resources in Egypt. AHRI worked
to fulfill its role through its diagnostic research efforts and by providing
services to the community. AHRI is responsible for recommending treatment
and preventive measures to inhibit the spread of diseases, Not only are its
efforts vital for the preservation of animal resources, but also for the
protection of human health. To meet these goals, AHRI is actively involved
in overseeing various aspects of animal health in Egypt.
With an
overwhelming array of viral and bacterial strains of enzootic and exotic
animal diseases, and a supply of animal stock that is often limiting, AHRI
is constantly concerned with updating its diagnostic techniques and
improving its recommended control methods. Although the ELISA technique was
introduced into the institute nearly a decade ago, it still carries
promising potential for more widespread applications including, but not
limited to, the identification of pathogenic bacteria. For enhancing
diagnosis, the prospects hold plans for more efficient utilization of such
equipment as the fluorescent and electron microscopes and cell culture
techniques.
Central
Laboratory for Aquaculture Research (CLAR) In its short
history, CLAR has performed extensive research in a wide variety of
subjects. One area of major concern for aquaculture in Egypt is the supply
of water. In an effort to conserve water from the River Nile, CLAR studied
the use of ground water in fish culture systems. With ground water being
used more extensively, water quality becomes a critical issue. The
development of fish culture systems requires a full accounting of water
quality, especially of heavy metals, which are produced by rain water
percolating through the Earth's crust. In one study, high concentrations of
iron were detected in the water drawn from a depth of 100 meters . High
levels of iron destroy the liver cells and gills and decrease the growth
rate of common carp and Clarias lazera. Treating the underground water
using KMnO 4 lowered the iron content to a permissible level and restored
water quality.
Also in the
area of water use, different management systems were compared, such as
multiple harvesting against traditional methods. The effect of fresh water
and drainage water on pond productivity was investigated in a comparative
study.
Several
studies on reproductive physiology shortened the interval between pituitary
extract doses and showed that pituitary gland extraction is superior to
using injections of gonadotrophin and steroid hormones. The effect of
stocking rates on growth performance, production and carcass traits of
mullet in polyculture systems has been evaluated; however, mullet culture is
still based entirely on natural spawning. This results in insufficient
numbers of fish for stocking the ponds. Efforts are under way to spawn
mullet artificially and thus improve stocking rates.
Other
polyculture systems under study include fish-rice and fish-duck systems. The
best techniques for duck production are being evaluated. Researchers
already know that in a fish-duck system, efficient use is made of total
biological production in a pond, and total protein production can be
doubled.
Tilapia is
considered one of the most desirable fish for aquaculture because of the
good price its high quality meat commands. However, because Egypt has a
semiarid climate and tilapia is a tropical fish, special measures must be
taken to ensure success. Since most tilapia do not eat or grow at
temperatures below 15oC and will not spawn at temperatures below
20°C, they must be over wintered indoors.
CLAR has
devised a low cost over wintering system suitable for Egyptian conditions.
In addition, enhancing the growth of Nile tilapia through the use of the
dietary steroid hormone “17-methytestosteronell” has been studied.
With respect
to nutrition, a number of topics have been investigated. These include the
effect of natural food and artificial feeding on growth performance of
mullet, winter feeding regimes of Nile tilapia, physical and nutritional
modifications for improving the commonly used cattle feed in fish farms, and
the effect of dietary levels of protein on the growth and reproduction of
Nile tilapia.
In the area
of genetics of salinity resistance, different species of Tilapia and mullet
collected from varied locations were used to investigate differences in gene
expression. The use of electrophoresis techniques to analyze the data
indicated that salinity locations influenced gene expression among species.
The rapidly
growing demand for fish cannot be met by a reliance on traditional fisheries
and existing fish farms. Therefore, CLAR is actively engaged in extension
programs designed to increase the acceptance of aquaculture, thus
providing employment opportunities and increasing the supply offish.
Since its
inception in 1987, the Central Laboratory for Agricultural Expert Systems (CLAES)
has established itself at the forefront of agricultural expert systems
applications in the developing world. CLAES occupies a unique position for
conducting original research on the use of expert systems in agriculture.
The laboratory achieved early success in adapting pre-built expert system
shells to local conditions. In addition, original expert system programs
were created at CLAES for the cultivation of cucumbers under plastic
tunnels. These locally designed programs are a great source of pride for the
scientists and staff of CLAES.
Studies have
shown that expert systems help improve the performance of extension agents,
the vital link between research activities' and the field. The expert
systems training courses provided by CLAES increase the knowledge base of
extension agents and speed the introduction of new technologies and
agronomic practices. Expert systems already in place are helping farmers
prepare land for cultivation, establish water and fertilizer regimens and
identify and treat 45 cucumber and 50 citrus disorders.
Official Report and Evaluation of NARP
In early 1994, USAID Egypt
requested that Tropical Research and Development, Inc., of Gainesville,
Florida, organized an assessment team of U.S. specialists to evaluate the
performance and impact of the Egyptian National Agricultural Research
Project (NARP) and recommend the nature of future USAID support. The
following paragraphs are a summary of the evaluation team’s report. The full
report is available through USAID Egypt (Cairo), the Ministry of Agriculture
and Land Reform, Cairo, Egypt, and Tropical Research and Development,
Gainesville, Florida, USA. (York, E.T.--105, 119)
A Dynamic Agricultural
Transformation through Research and Policy Reform
"Egypt is in the midst of a
dynamic agricultural transformation, highlighted by unprecedented yield
gains and production of its major crops. For a country that has limited
arable lands and water supplies and that already enjoys high crop yields,
this is a tremendous accomplishment. This progress has resulted, primarily,
from effective research programs and significant policy reform during the
past 10- to 15-year period.
The case for research in Egypt
is easy to make. Limited land, limited water, rapidly growing population,
food needs outstripping production—these require continuing intensification
of production on a limited natural resource base. Such intensification
requires increasingly higher yields, greater input efficiencies, reduced
negative environmental effects, a greater knowledge base, and superior
management. But this picture, while daunting, is not all bleak, for the
Egyptian farmer is one of the best in the world. Egyptian farmers know much
about the land and the soil and water to be managed; they also possess an
abundance of knowledge and experience concerning the art and craft of
farming.
While the Egyptian farmer is
exceptional in skills and acumen, to continue to be successful, each farmer
also needs a continuous flow of new technologies. Only a productive,
problem-solving research system can fulfill that need. We are convinced that
Egypt is building an effective research system to help solve its
agricultural and natural resource management problems, and that such a
research system is essential to Egypt’s future. The National Agricultural
Research Project and its predecessor projects have played a key role in the
changes and improvements that have taken place, and the work that the
project has begun or stimulated will become even more valuable in the
future. What is important now is to build on the base that has been
established in order to ensure that Egyptian agricultural science can be
vibrant and innovative in solving the great problems faced.
Yield growth in major Egyptian
crops can only be described as phenomenal over the past decade. Productivity
gains for many crops have been exceptionally great since the early 1980s.
Moreover, since 1981 Egypt’s agricultural performance far exceeds the
average for the rest of the world in rate of gain in the indices of total
agricultural production, agricultural production per capita, total food
production, and food production per capita. It should be noted, as well,
that with 31 of 32 major crops Egypt exceeded world average yields. With two
crops, Egyptian yields were the highest in the world. For several other
crops, Egypt ranked second or third in the world in average yield.
In the performance of
animal-based agriculture, Egypt has not done as well as with crops-except,
perhaps, with poultry. For example, Egypt’s production of milk per cow
equals only one-third of the world average."
Advances in Egyptian
Agriculture
"There have been very
significant advances made in Egyptian agriculture since 1985 during the
period of the NARP’s existence. It cannot be said, however, that the
National Agricultural Research Project, by any means, was totally
responsible for such improvements. We believe these improvements can be
attributed to three major factors (not in any priority order):
-
The major policy reforms
implemented during the past 12 years under the dedicated and enlightened
leadership of Deputy Prime Minister Youssef Wally (98). Many of these reforms
have removed significant disincentives that were holding back agricultural
development, providing a policy atmosphere that is much more supportive of
such development.
-
The improvement in
agricultural research programs made possible, in part, by the USAID-sponsored
projects in the late 1970s to mid-1980s. These projects helped to provide
the technology and demonstrated the capacity to increase agricultural output
significantly. We would note that this significant progress would likely not
have been realized in the absence of either the policy reforms or the
improved research programs. Each was, in some respects, dependent on the
other for its full impact to be realized.
-
Contributions by NARP,
building on the foundation established by the earlier USAID-supported
research projects, including a major policy project. The NARP has not only
built on that foundation but also has supported other research areas not
covered by the earlier projects. The results of these efforts will likely be
felt primarily in later years.
NARP has also supported
extension and technology transfer activities that are vital to help the
farmers apply the technologies generated through research. These programs
are beginning to contribute to more rapid adoption of new technologies and
the further strengthening of the agricultural sector.
Improvements in the seed
industry in recent years-also a major objective of NARP-are beginning to
contribute to the improvement of the agricultural sector.
The New Initiatives component
of the NARP has provided an excellent vehicle to address emerging problems
or opportunities that could not be anticipated when the project was
originally designed. The benefits of most of these efforts will be realized
after the National Agricultural Research Project has been completed.
With 21 major crops
there was a modest increase in the crop production index from 1980 to 1983
(l percent annual increase)--but a substantially higher rate of 36
percent from 1983 to 1990, reflecting a 4.5 percent annual growth rate.
These data indicate that improvements in crop production have not been
limited to cereals only but significant improvement have been made in a
broad spectrum of other crops as well. Such advances with the 21 crops are
even more dramatic when changes in the current or nominal value of these
crops during this period are examined. These data indicate a growth rate in
nominal values of these crops of some 19 percent annually since 1980-with
growth much more rapid since 1984.
Such improvement in value
reflects not only greater production but also significant improvements in
prices of the commodities resulting from the major policy changes of the
1980s and early 1990s.
These rapid gains in current
value since 1980 reflect inflationary price increases as well. However,
there were also significant improvements in the real value of this
production. In fact, in the period from 1980 to 1990 the real crop
production value increased 89 percent with an annual growth rate of 6.6
percent. Such improvement in the real value of such improvements in
production, we believe, has been reflected in significant advances in income
to the farmer. Perhaps the significance of these improvements is best
reflected in the fact that wheat production increased more in Egypt since
1987 than in all of Egypt’s history prior to that date.
But the greatest impact of the
NARP, we believe, is yet to come. The National Agricultural Library is yet
to be equipped and stocked. Laboratory equipment, vehicles, and many other
commodities are ordered and are yet to arrive. Buildings and laboratories
are still being renovated, and improvements continue to be made in upgrading
the land and other infrastructure at the research centers.
Important improvements are
being made through the technology transfer program in upgrading facilities
for extension workers. At some nine locations, management information
systems for use by extension are being installed through the technology
transfer component.
Four regional research and
extension councils have just been formed for the major regions of Egypt.
When fully activated they should serve a very useful function in helping to
coordinate more effectively the total research effort of the country and in
focusing attention on continuing needs for research and extension as new
problems emerge.
The extensive training
program, which is still in progress, should continue to pay dividends for
many years to come. Significant improvements have been made in the seed
industry, which should contribute to further improvements in the
agricultural sector.
Measuring capacity for
effective research is very difficult and, at least, somewhat subjective.
However, we have identified several indicators that we believe are important
in assessing the development and effectiveness of a national agricultural
research system. There is strong and unmistakable evidence that NARP is
greatly enhancing Egypt’s capacity to do excellent agricultural research.
All of the capacity-building indicators discussed in our report point
strongly to an enhancement which should contribute to Egyptian agriculture
well into the twenty-first century."
Closing the Food Security Gap
"In the report of the U.S.
Presidential Mission on Agricultural Development in 1982, major attention
was devoted to the "food gap" in Egypt. The gap had been increasing since
1960 when Egypt was essentially self-sufficient in food. Food production
increased at a steady but slow’ pace from 1960 to 1980. However, utilization
of the 10 primary food products-wheat (and flour), maize, groundnuts,
lentils, sugar, cooking oil, red meat, white meat, dairy products, and
fish-was increasing at a much faster rate than production, especially from
1974 to 1980. If nothing had been done to modify these two trend lines, the
food gap would have grown from approximately one million tons in 1960 to
nine million tons in 1980 and 26 million tons in 2000 (figure 1 [in the full
report, figure 5.5]).
From 1980 to 1992, however,
there was a sharp increase in production, primarily since 1985, with a
distinct slowing down in the rate of increase in food utilization. These
changes in the slopes of the two curves since 1980, when projected to the
year 2000, show a potential food gap in 2000 of some 4.5 million tons. This
gap is about 17 percent of the projected gap that would have occurred in
2000 based on extrapolations of the trends in 1980 (fig 2)


Most of this narrowing of the
gap has resulted from the sharp upturn in production since 1985. It is
obvious, however, that the rate of utilization is beginning to slow down as
well.
These changes were also
reflected in wheat imports, which reached a maximum level of around 7.4
million tons in 1987 and dropped to around 5.3 million tons by 1993.
Data indicate that little
progress has been made since 1980 in improving the self-sufficiency level in
vegetable oil, fish, and red meat. This would suggest that there is
significant need to produce more of these products for domestic consumption.
There is considerable evidence
that technology is available to facilitate significantly higher crop yields
than are currently realized. Despite this, perhaps Egypt should never be
expected to fully close the food gap or to become totally self-sufficient.
It would be desirable, however, for Egypt to become self-reliant or
economically self-sufficient in food production. This would entail exporting
sufficient products from agriculture to cover the costs of importing the
agricultural commodities that were not produced domestically.
There would appear to be
excellent opportunities for such exports, especially of higher valued
horticultural products. Several factors make this feasible: the nearness to
large markets in Europe and the Gulf States; the ability to supply these
markets during winter months when needs in Europe, especially, are greatest;
unusually favorable weather conditions, including an almost totally
frost-free climate; the ability to control water supplies; the absence of
major, damaging storms, etc. In fact, Egypt has been likened to a large
greenhouse in which environmental conditions, can, in large measure, be
controlled.
Egypt has thus far developed
only a modest export market for horticultural crops, and these markets are
not stable. They fluctuate greatly from one year to the next. If Egyptian
farmers are producing enough to supply the high levels of demand in some
years, they are undoubtedly producing too much in other years when exports
are significantly lower. We saw evidence of this in Ismailia in talking with
several growers who said they had great difficulty some years in selling
their strawberries and other crops for export.
Obviously, to be truly
competitive in export markets, any country must consistently have available
a high-quality product. This requires the development of a good system of
grades and standards, handling procedures which do not damage the product
needlessly, refrigeration facilities for storage and transportation, etc. To
date, Egypt has done little in these areas. There is urgent need to take
advantage of what would appear to be excellent opportunities in this area.
With the move towards
privatization of agricultural operations, there is also a great need to
develop effective storage and marketing procedures for commodities to meet
domestic market needs. Officials point out that at harvest time, farmers
flood the market with their product because they have no storage facilities
and they need income as soon as possible. With farmers all over the country
doing this at about the same time, prices drop precipitously. However,
prices quickly come back up once the glut is gone.
We strongly recommend that
steps be taken to improve and further develop both domestic and export
markets for agricultural commodities to take better advantage of excellent
production capacities."
Criticism of NARP and Response
Thereto
NARP has received rather
severe criticism from some sources, including a critical audit by the
Regional Inspector General Cairo. This audit resulted in a prominent U.S.
senator in 1989 criticizing the project and expressing serious concern about
the effort. This episode, and perhaps other incidents, caused USAID
Washington and USAID Egypt to focus much attention on NARP, leading to
serious questioning of whether the project should even be continued. There
was, in fact, a major reduction in AID funding and a total cancellation of
important parts of NARP and a reduction of its budget
We were told by a senior USAID
official that "many USAID and Government of Egypt actions, reactions, and
responses that hindered the project can be traced back to the early negative
history." There were also changes in leadership on both sides of the project
(three USAID Mission directors, for example) as well as "changes in
direction as natural responses to different leadership management styles and
visions."
The assessment team feels that
the problems and delays were apparently contributed to by both sides, and
the burden of responsibility for these problems and delays does not reside
with one party alone; both must share some of the burden. Frankly our team
has had difficulty understanding why USAID’s commitments were drastically
cut in the first place, given NARP’s obvious successes.
While there have continued to
be implementation delays and other less serious administrative difficulties,
which are undoubtedly irritating and frustrating to both parties, we believe
minor difficulties should not be the source of undue concern and must be
weighed against the overall outstanding accomplishments of the project. "
Research to improve efficiency and productivity
in agriculture is never done
"We are fully in accord with
the Government of Egypt’s Ministry of Agriculture’s major strategic goals
for the agricultural sector, namely, to optimize crop returns per unit of
land and water, to enhance sustainability of resource patterns and
protection of the environment, to bridge the food gap and achieve
self-reliance in agriculture, and to expand foreign exchange earnings from
agricultural exports.
During the assessment team’s
visit to Egypt, we were asked a very pertinent question by a USAID official:
"If Egypt is making all these advances in agricultural production, why is
there need to continue support for further research-related activities in
agriculture. Isn’t this task now done so that we can move on to address
other needs?" The simple answer to that question is that research to improve
efficiency and productivity in agriculture is never done-never finished. As
long as there are more human mouths to feed, there is continuing need for
such research.
In fact, a significant amount
of such research would be needed merely to accommodate the food needs of a
stable human population. But neither Egyptian nor global population is
stable. In fact, over 90 million additional people are added to the world’s
population annually, and Egypt’s rate of population growth of some 2.3-2.5
percent is above the world average of 1.6 to 1.8 percent.
Such constantly growing need
resulting from population growth demands increasing levels of
research-especially in situations like those found in Egypt where yield
levels are already high. When a country reaches a very high level on the
crop yield curve, as Egypt has, each additional increment of production may
become more difficult to achieve.
But Egypt, because of its very
limited arable land and water resources, is probably more dependent on
research to expand food production that any other country in the world.
Moreover, the primary beneficiary of such research is the consumer, who is
served by having not only an adequate supply of food, but also higher
quality and less expensive food as well. Therefore, the need for a
high-quality, productive agricultural research program is vital to a sound
economy and a stable political future. While much has been achieved through
past support of agricultural research, much more effort is needed.
USAID projects have
contributed immensely to improving the productivity of Egyptian agriculture
for some fifteen years through their support of research, policy reform and
other programs. NARP, we believe, has been a vital part of that effort for
the past eight to nine years. However, because of the significant delays in
the implementation of the project, along with major reductions in the amount
of USAID financial commitments, there is still much to be done."
Future Efforts in Research Should Include:
-
Expand research collaboration
both internationally and domestically;
-
Research on New Lands;
-
Research activities for
maintaining a sustainable agriculture;
-
Breeding to reduce need for
pesticides;
-
Development of cultivars more
tolerant to environmental stresses;
-
Research aimed at producing
more per unit of land and water;
-
Public policy and data
analysis;
-
Market research and
development-for both export and domestic markets;
-
Further improve research
infrastructure;
-
Build on the experience of the
Technology Transfer Component and continue
-
the improvement of extension;
-
Restore cotton ginning
capabilities for breeding work;
-
Greater emphasis on research
dealing with food animals;
-
Greater effort on improvement
of vegetable oil production;
-
Continued support in genetic
engineering and other areas of modem biotechnology research;
-
Further development of the
"Expert Systems" Program to be used by both
-
extension and the private
sector in technology transfer;
-
Continued emphasis on human
resource development;
-
Consolidate and emphasize
on-farm water management;
-
Research to address long-term
strategic goals
The team firmly believes that
while great progress has been made over the past fifteen years or so through
USAID assistance, there is continuing need to develop strong and sustainable
capacity to accommodate further support for agricultural research and
related efforts. This is especially true until there can be developed means
for assuring adequate financial support from local sources—Government of
Egypt and otherwise.
At some point USAID support
will likely be greatly reduced or cease. Hopefully that will not occur until
a much strengthened research capacity is developed and until there is better
assurance that there is adequate support to maintain the capacity of such
enhanced programs.
The national research effort
in agriculture will likely be primarily dependent on future Government of
Egypt funding. We firmly believe that agricultural research and related
efforts should receive higher priority in such funding. Given past
experience, however, there is little assurance that this will be adequate to
maintain a vigorous research program. Therefore, we suggest two possible
approaches through which funds could be generated to complement Government
of Egypt funding.
We recommend that
consideration be given to the development of programs to generate research
funds through fanner assessments or contributions. For example, a possible
approach could be one in which each ton of fertilizer or feed purchased
and/or each ton of product a farmer sells is assessed a very small
percentage of the value, with the funds so generated being put into a
special fund-to be used only for supporting research-related activities. The
amount of the assessment would likely be no greater than one-tenth of one
percent per ton-although different rates could be established for different
items.
A "Piasters-for-Pounds program
or something similar could be effective, with farmers realizing that they
are investing very modestly in programs that will pay them great dividends
in terms of enhanced incomes resulting from the application of research
results.
In addition to direct funding
for current programs, we recommend that while the United States is
committing large sums of money to Egypt, consideration be given to using
some of these funds to establish an endowment, the proceeds from which could
be used to provide continuing support for research-related activities.
Funds put into the endowment
could either be in the form of U.S. dollars from ESF commitments or from
local currency generated through PL 480, PL 416, or other U.S. programs.
Funds from these sources could be put into a "special," nongovernmental
foundation annually for several years through which an endowment could build
up sufficiently to help assure that the progress made through current U.S.
assistance could be sustained. The foundation into which such funds would be
placed could be governed by a joint Egyptian-U.S. board, if desirable.
The U.S. government provides
at least $815 million annually to Government of Egypt in economic support
funding as the result of a program that grew out of the Camp David Accord in
the late 1970s. It was primarily these funds that were used to support the
research programs discussed in this report. The continuing question is "how
can these funds be used most effectively?"
A very strong case can be
developed for putting significant amounts of these funds into the
agricultural sector. Agriculture continues to be one of the three most
important segments of the economy. Over half the Egyptian people are engaged
in farming or agriculturally related business/industry. Moreover, the
agriculture sector has already enacted more reforms and has moved farther
toward privatization than any other sector and is therefore better
positioned to use U.S. assistance more productively than any other sector.
We believe that high priority
should be given by the United States to supporting the agricultural sector.
We further believe that, at this juncture, support for functions and needs
we have addressed herein should receive highest priority in terms of future
U.S. support."
The Assessment Team:
Donald L. Plucknett. James
Ross, Harold Youngberg, and B.T. York. Jr., team leader E.T. York. Jr.(105)
Outline
|