|
TITLE PAGE
DEDICATION &
INTENT OF THE AUTHOR
OUTLINE OF REPORT
INTRODUCTION—A WAY OF LIFE
EGYPT TODAY
THE NILE RIVER
CHAPTER 1 ANCIENT EGYPT
CHAPTER 2 MUHAMMED ALI
CHAPTER 3 POLICIES IN 20TH
CENTURY
CHAPTER 4 CAPACITY BUILDING– NARP
CHAPTER 5 POST NARP
CHAPTER 6 RESEARCH TODAY
CHAPTER 7 AGRICULTURE AND
ECONOMICS
CHAPTER 8 AGRICULTURAL
GROWTH AND EMPLOYMENT
CHAPTER 9 EGYPT’S
FUTURE—HORTICULTURE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
|
Chapter 1--Agriculture and Horticulture in Ancient Egypt
For over 5000 years the farmers of Egypt
created a civilization based on the union of the land and the Nile
river. It was one of the earliest civilizations and it had a profound
influence on the region. Today agriculture in Egypt combines the use
of traditional methods with a rich base of knowledge of the land and
the environment. A professor of horticulture at Purdue
University and a colleague of mine,
Dr. Jules Janick (49), provides this description of agriculture in ancient Egypt.
"Ancient Egypt and Natural river irrigation
shaped the early landscape of ancient Egypt. Drainage was not required for
the Valley to become livable. It may have constituted a problem in the lower
lying parts of the Delta which were often marshy. With the natural flooding
and draining of the floodplain the annual inundation permitted a single
crop-season over two-thirds of the alluvial ground.
Organized by regional
authorities, every Egyptian had to move about thirty cubic metres of soil in
about ten days every year. With this relatively small investment of labour,
they kept the system in working order. Once the main canals, many of them
natural, were in place, they just had to be dredged yearly to prevent their
clogging up; the levees had to be raised, and smaller ditches had to be
re-excavated.
The building of dams at right
angles to the flow of the Nile, separating the Nile Valley into basins,
precedes the Old Kingdom. Dikes were built along the banks of the river and
the basins which covered between 400 and 1700 hectares, were carefully
levelled. The river water was diverted into canals on either side of the
Nile. At the time of the highest flooding (towards the end of September)
most of the Nile Valley was covered with water, only villages and cities,
built on higher ground and connected by dams, were above water. When the
water level reached the mouths of the canals, the dams separating the canals
from the river were opened and the basins and canals flooded. When the
highest water level was reached, one to two metres above the ground, the
canals were stopped and the water left standing until it evaporated or was
drained off during the next two months. The waterlogged earth did not need
much further irrigation. The boundaries of the fields were marked with
boundary stones. These had to be replaced frequently after the inundation,
based on cadastral records.
The building of dams and
canals was done at local or regional levels, and while in the past many held
irrigation to be the prime cause for the emergence of a central government,
most think nowadays that the involvement of the national government in the
irrigation was probably minimal: the opening and closing of the canal
sluices to Lake Moeris in the Fayum in order to regulate the flow of the
river must have been a task for the central authorities.
In most countries heavy
ploughs have to be used to turn over the soil, so that the growing plants
get enough nutrients, but in Egypt the Nile flood deposited the nutrients on
top, and the ploughing served just to break up the top soil before sowing or
for covering the seed The Egyptian plough was
lightly built and tied to the horns of the cattle. Cows were generally used
for ploughing, which caused their milk production to decrease during
ploughing time. A helper, often a child, led the animals, sometimes urging
them on with a stick. When draft animals were unavailable, humans would pull
the plow.
Hoeing was another way of
loosening the soil. Because the handles of the hoes were very short (a
feature of these tools even today in southern countries), this was
back-breaking work. The sower walked back and forth over the still moist
field, a bag in one hand and spreading the seed with the other, or having a
two handled woven basket tied around his neck, both his hands free for
sowing. Sometimes a plough covered the seeds with earth. Driving hogs or
sheep over the field served the same purpose.
Crops Harvested
The total amount of grain
harvested depended on the surface covered by the flooding Nile, which was
between perhaps 20,000 and 34,000 square kilometers. Taking
pre-green-revolution wheat yields of about 750 kg/ha as a base, the annual
amount of corn produced was approximately between 1.5 and 2.5 million tons,
supposing that most of the surface was used to produce corn. About 4 to 5
million people lived in Egypt during the New Kingdom. In a bad year the
annual yield was less than 300 kg per head, possibly considerably less.
Occurrences of corn dearth
were frequent. Some estimate that there would have been sufficient grain
only every third year. This may be a bit pessimistic. At any rate, Egypt
seems to have had grain surpluses often enough that they could be stored in
state granaries and even be exported. During Roman times it was one of the
bread baskets of Rome.
The harvest generally took
place shortly before the beginning of the next flooding, about in May or
June, at times in April. The whole population took part and on big estates
journeying harvesting teams were employed. These itinerant reapers began the
season in the southern part of the country and followed the ripening crops
downriver. The Egyptians seemingly knew ergot which does not proliferate
well under the dry Egyptian weather conditions and was probably never the
health danger it was to be in the rye eating countries of northern Europe
during the late Middle Ages.
The administration was
involved in everything the farmer did, from the assignment of the land to
the collecting of the taxes. Before the harvest began, surveyors, scribes,
supervisors and inspectors came to measured the size of the fields and
estimated the quantity of grain. These officials fixed the tax the peasant
had to give up to the royal treasury or the representative of one of the
gods, among whom Amen had the vastest and best properties. Scribes trying to
impress their pupils with the harshness of a peasant’s daily struggle for
survival, may have slightly exaggerated the methods used by tax-collectors,
but Egyptian officials were not noted for sparing the rod (nor have peasants
ever shown an alacrity to part with the fruit of their labor)
Low inundations were the main
reason for bad harvests and they affected the whole of the country. But
there were no end of causes for low yields, from the failure of the local
administration to care for the upkeep of canals and dykes, to the
destruction of the harvest by pests and raids of thieves. Corn that was not
destined for immediate consumption was stored in communal granaries, which
served as a kind of bank.
Important crops were emmer (Triticum
dicoccum) which stopped being grown by the Roman period, barley (Hordeum
hexastichon), used for baking bread and brewing beerx, the significance of
which declined during the Roman Period when wine replaced beer to a large
extent, wheat (Triticum aestivum), an unidentified sort of cereal, flax (Linum
usitatissimum) for the production of cloth and ropes, the naturally
occurring papyrus reeds (which became extinct in Egypt and were recently
reintroduced), used for paper, boats, ropes, mats and many other things and
the castor oil plant (Ricinus communis), from the fruit of which oil for
many purposes (among others as a sort of money) was pressed.
Domesticated in Mesopotamia,
the opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) may have been grown on a
commercial scale near Thebes during the New Kingdom, and opium thebaicum
was possibly traded by Phoenicians to southern Europe, the Levant and North
Africa. Jewelry and small, perhaps foreign, containers looking somewhat like
poppy-heads dating to the 18th dynasty have been found, but few - if any -
traces of the plant itself or its products. Oil was extracted from poppy
seeds in the Fayum during the third century BCE. Some scholars think that
the production of opium for medicinal purposes was introduced into Egypt
only in Roman times.
Horticulture
Gardening was much more labor
intensive than agriculture. Gardens, orchards, and vineyards were often on
high ground and quite a distance from the Nile. They had to be irrigated by
hand with the water drawn from wells or the river. Moreover, in the absence
of the depositions of silt with which the Nile revitalized the inundated
areas, the soil of the higher lying ground needed fertilizing. During the
Roman era at least, farmers at Karanis in the Faiyum kept pigeons in
dovecotes and used their dung to fertilize the soil. Pliny thought that
growing conditions in Egypt were especially favorable to the
horticulturalist. He claimed that in Egypt the leguminous plants appear
as early as the third day after they are sown. Gardeners grew radishes,
sesame, lentils, beans and chickpeas (Cicer arietinum), lettuce, onions,
leeks, dill (Anethum graveolens), grapes, melons, cucumbers and gourds. Many
Egyptians had gardens adjacent to their homes where they grew small
quantities of vegetables and fruit for their own consumption.
Bee-keeping
The first official mention of
honey production dates to about 2400 BCE, in official lists of apiarists;
the oldest pictures of bee-keepers are found in New Kingdom tombs. The kind
of hives depicted in these reliefs, woven baskets covered with clay, are
still seen in the Sudan today. Cylindrical hives were made of clay.
The main centre of bee-keeping
was Lower Egypt with its extensive cultivated lands, where the bee was
chosen as a symbol for the country. One of Pharaoh's titles was Bee King,
and the gods also were associated with the bee. The sanctuary in which
Osiris was worshiped was the Mansion of the Bee. But even nomadic Upper
Egyptians probably kept bees, as their use of honey in the production of
green eye paint indicates. There were itinerant apiarists in the Faiyum in
Ptolemaic times and possibly also beekeepers living by the Nile who loaded
their hives onto boats, shipped them upriver in early spring, and then
followed the flowering of the plants northwards as they were reported to do
in the 19th century CE.
The Egyptians seem to have
valued wild honey even more. Honey hunters, often protected by royal
archers, would scour the wild wadis for bee colonies.
Honey Temples kept bees in order to
satisfy the desire of the gods for honey and for the production of medicines
and ointments. But demand far outran local production. Honey, like many
other luxury goods was imported from Djahi or Retenu (north of Jerusalem) and possibly even
further afield. Canaan, for instance, was called Land of Milk and Honey
in the Hebrew tradition, and the probably fictitious Sinuhe waxed lyrical
about the riches of Yaa, an unidentified Asiatic region.
Farmed and Domesticated Animals
Sheep, goats, cattle, pigs and
geese were raised from earliest times and supplied milk, wool, meat, eggs,
leather, skins, horn and fat. Even the dung had its uses. There is little
evidence that mutton was consumed, while domesticated pigs were eaten at
least since the beginning of the 4th millennium BCE, but pork had no place
in religious ceremonies. Goat meat on the other hand was acceptable even to
upper class Egyptians. Goat skins served as water containers and floating
devices.
The Egyptian farmers, in their
early experimental phase, also tried to domesticate other animals such as
hyenas, gazelles and cranes, but abandoned these attempts after the Old
Kingdom. The domestic chicken didn't make its appearance until the New
Kingdom, and then only in isolated places. It became more common in the Late
Period. By then the Egyptians seem to have mastered artificial incubation.
On the whole the ancient
Egyptians seem to have been accomplished farmers, and they were certainly
lucky with their system of irrigation which prevented the salinization of
the soil. Other cultures relying on artificial irrigation suffered from.
Diodorus Siculus, a Roman historian writing during the first century BCE,
had a high opinion of the agricultural expertise of the Egyptians.
Economics of Pharonic Egypt
The economy of Pharonic Egypt
has been called an ancient command economy, but one should always remember
that such modern definitions are not as absolute as they might be today.
Still, there was a specialized bureaucracy which monitored or controlled
much of its activity, one of the hallmarks of planned economies. On the
other hand, the officials - as state employees and not as private landowners
or managers of state farms - probably did not tell farmers what to grow. But
they remeasured and reassigned the land after every inundation - based on
past assignments, assessed the expected crops, collected part of the produce
as taxes, stored and redistributed it. Storage and redistribution were
generally done on a local basis. Regional facilities provided produce in
case there was a shortfall in one of the local centers. Bureaucrats were
also in charge of public works which were mostly religious in character and
involved at times tens of thousands of workers and administrators.
The Population
The vast majority of the
population, probably more than nine tenths during the first two millennia of
Egypt's history, lived on the land in mostly autarkic village communities
and, in early times at least, in a state close to serfdom. The land they
worked belonged in theory to the gods, Osiris and after his demise to Horus
and his earthly incarnation, the pharaoh. In practice a virtual ownership
evolved, a development which culminated in the Late Period, when land could
be freely bought and sold. Apart from the tenant peasants, a large section
of the population worked as farm laborers on the estates of noblemen and of
the temples. During the New Kingdom perhaps a third of the land was in the
hands of the Amen priesthood, with a proportionally large number of workers
and slaves. Administrators, priests, traders and craftsmen lived mostly in
the cities along the Nile, which could be supplied with victuals relatively
easily and cheaply by boat.
Sources of Wealth
Agriculture created most of
Egypt's wealth. Grain, vegetables, fruit, cattle, goats, pigs and fowl were
grown, and fish from the Nile were caught, and eventual surpluses, after
deduction of the various taxes, were sold on the markets.
Thanks to the yearly inundations the soil remained fertile. But agricultural
techniques were not very efficient. Improvements were rare, implements
remained primitive and the breeding of better livestock was haphazard.
Fishing appears to have existed on a very small scale. But practically all
the fish consumed were caught in the Nile. Hunting, a leisure activity to
the rich, and gathering played a small economic role over all, but may have
been crucial to the survival of the poorest.
Manufacturing
A large part of the
manufactured goods came from the families which produced the raw materials.
Labor was divided according to gender, with the processing generally left to
the women. While the men grew flax, their women spun it into thread and wove
the linen. A sizable proportion of the grain produced was used for beer
production. The fish caught by the men had to be cleaned and dried by the
women to be of much use in the hot climate of Egypt. In the towns small
factories appeared, often financed by rich noblemen: bakeries, breweries,
carpentry workshops and the like with a few dozen employees. In these
manufactories weaving, for instance, became a largely male occupation with
the introduction of upright looms during the New Kingdom.
Mining
Most of the things mined were
of little interest to anyone but a small number of rich people. Precious
metals were not in general circulation until the Late Period and even then
remained in the hands of few. The metals used for tools - copper, bronze
and, from the Late Period onwards, iron - were expensive and the implements
fashioned from them were beyond the reach of many. Poorer people continued
to use stone and wooden tools for most purposes well into the bronze and
even iron age.
Gems too remained in the
possession of a wealthy minority and the stone quarried for temples and
tombs served the same class of people and profited only the craftsmen
involved in building. Natron needed for the embalming process, was mined in
the Wadi Natrun. Embalming was too expensive for all but a few.
Commerce and banking
Most of the produce was
consumed by the producers themselves. What was left after landlords and
tax-collectors had taken their share, could be sold by barter on the free
market either directly to consumers or to professional traders. Little is
known about these merchants. It is generally assumed that they were, at
least until the Late Period, for the most part agents of the crown or the
great estates. Some of the wheat harvested and belonging to private owners
was stored in state warehouses. So was much of the grain collected as taxes.
Written withdrawal orders by owners of lots of grain were used as a kind of
currency. These grain banks continued to serve growers and traders even
after the introduction of coined money. Under the Ptolemies a central bank
at Alexandria recorded all accounts of the granary banks dotting the
country. Payments were transferred from account to account similar to the
modern giro system. Credit entries were recorded with the owners name being
in the genitive or possessive case and debit entries in the dative case.
Since the second half of the
first millennium BCE gold, silver, and copper in specie were used mostly in
dealings with foreigners, be they mercenaries or merchants.
High interest rates did not encourage commerce and during the first
millennium BCE they may well have put Egyptian merchants at a disadvantage
vis-á-vis foreign traders who were funded from abroad. During the Saite
Period monthly interest rates could reach 10%.
Energy
The main energy source of
ancient times was muscle power provided to a large extent by humans. The
harnessing of animals was inefficient. The yoke resting on the animals'
shoulders was unknown, and the shafts of the ploughs were fastened to the
horns of the cows.
Vehicles with light spoked
wheels came into use during the New Kingdom and served mostly for warfare
and sport. Horses were introduced during the Second Intermediary Period and
never achieved economic importance. Anything tansported by land, even in
arid desert regions, was either carried by humans or donkeys, or dragged on
wooden sledges.
Wind energy was exploited only
by ships and even there quite inefficiently: The square sails used enabled
only sailing before the wind. The Egyptians were fortunate in that the Nile
flowed from south to north. The prevailing winds were northerly and sufficed
to blow the ships upriver. They were let to drift downriver with furled
sails. But often a destination could only be reached through rowing which
required large crews.
Fire was needed for cooking
and baking food, smelting and casting metal, burning pottery and very rarely
for making bricks. For the working of metals high temperatures had to be
achieved and this was done quite possibly with charcoal. No coal was
available in ancient times and wood was not very plentiful. One suspects
that ordinary fires were fed with any dry vegetable or animal matter that
was at hand. The heat of the sun on the other hand was put to very good use
in the production of mud bricks, which were the perfect building material in
a practically rainless country like Egypt.
Warfare
Military ventures can be a
source of income - as long as one is successful. Egypt was fortunate in this
respect until the Late Period, when it came under the domination of foreign
powers. What began with relatively benign occupations by the Libyans,
Kushites, Assyrians and Persians, became oppressive under the Roman Empire,
which exploited its provinces ruthlessly. The attempts of Cleopatra VII to
retain independence were unsuccessful and the country fell prey to Octavian.
For as long as Rome ruled the Mediterranean, Egypt was little more than its
bread basket.
Unlike the much vaunted empire
of the New Kingdom, which was mostly a string of subject states in Lower
Retenu run by local potentates, the real and lasting conquests lay in the
south, in Nubia and Kush. Nubia at least was directly ruled and exploited by
the Egyptians. Its importance as supplier of gold, slaves and luxury goods
is underlined by the appointment of vice-roys. No other region conquered by
Egypt was as closely integrated economically and culturally and retained
this affinity for centuries after Egypt's power had declined in the first
millennium BCE.
Bravery in battle was rewarded
with appointments, decorations in the form of golden necklaces and
bracelets, and gifts of land and slaves, part of the booty plundered from
vanquished enemies. Tribute was imposed on defeated nations and the
'exchange' of gifts between the pharaohs and the kings of client states was
generally in Egypt's favor.
Slavery
The practice of slavery was
practically ubiquitous in ancient times. In Egypt it was seemingly less
harsh and widespread than in other societies. Still, some branches of the
economy like mining depended to some extent on the labor and expendability
of slaves, above all during the New Kingdom, when warfare and trade greatly
increased the number of enslaved foreigners.
Taxation
Ancient Egypt is considered by
some to have been the most heavily taxed nation and to have collapsed under
the weight of the levies imposed on the populace. But, with a few minor
interruptions, its society existed peacefully and basically unchanged for
more than two millennia. The state relied on revenues in the forms of labor
and taxes paid in kind.
A major part of the levies
imposed on the people was used to stabilize society. A bureaucratic
administration, at first native and in the Late Period increasingly foreign,
enforced order throughout the country during most of its history. Three
millennia of mainly quiet development point to the success of this policy:
Grain was stored which could be distributed in times of famine. Corvée
workers were fed from these stores during the months of inundation when work
in the fields was impossible. Artisans constructing public buildings found
employment, paid by the royal treasury. Even the offerings at the temples
were at least partially used to feed the poor. Of course, different classes
of people benefited to different degrees, but care was taken not to leave
too many people with nothing to lose, a lesson the Spartans and the Romans
for instance never learned. While famines affected the poor much more than
the rich, in normal times there was not that much difference as regards
health, survival of ones children or even longevity.
In a society where precious
metals were not considered a special means of exchange and were mostly in
the hands of the pharaohs and the temples, wealth was synonymous with
possession of land. Theoretically all the land belonged to the pharaoh who
could dispose of it at will. Large tracts were given to the military, above
all during times of unrest when the kings needed their support and were
unable to recompense them in any other way. Officials were also
beneficiaries of such royal munificence. But most of the land came to be
owned outright by the temples and the peasantry.
A considerable amount of
wealth was invested in the building of tombs and the services following
burial, which were supposed to go on for ever. The gods had to be
propitiated by offerings and rituals celebrated by great numbers of priests.
To maintain this clerical establishment large parts of Egypt were donated to
the temples. By the New Kingdom they appear to have owned as much as a third
of the arable land and were exempt from paying taxes. Even the people in
their employment were protected by law against impressments. This
concentration of wealth may have contributed to the decline of the state
under the 20th dynasty.
Ancient Trade Routes
|
(89) “Rediscover Ancient
Egypt with Tehuti Research Foundation” www.egypt-tehuti.org |
Superficially, Ancient Egypt seems isolated and distinct from the rest of
the world, isolated by the deserts that hem in the narrow valley of the
Nile. Yet the Egyptians were in constant contact with other countries. The
needs of a civilized society, such as the Ancient Egyptians, are not fully
satisfied with the produce of its homeland. Thus, trade routes were
developed to faraway places. The Nile was navigable throughout the length of
Egypt. The Red Sea gave access to Africa and the Far East. The Mediterranean
Sea gave them access to countries in Europe and even to northern Europe and
the Americas. Travel in ancient days was much more extensive and common than
is generally imagined.
Egypt was connected with the lands to the south by three main routes:
The Forty
Days’ Road links Asyut in the Nile Valley to El Fasher in the Dar-Fur
Province of Sudan, a journey of 1,082 miles (1,721 km). It was the shortest
and safest distance to travel into western Africa. From El Fasher, another
route led west through Dar-Fur, toward Lake Chad, ending in the area of Kano
(northern Nigeria), at the upper reaches of the Niger River Basin. It began
at Sunt (Aswan), and went to El Fasher in Dar-Fur, by way of the oases of
Selima and Bir Natrum. Sunt (Elephantine) Road also branched off to Semna
West, where the caravans and expeditions transferred to ships in order to
continue the journey to beyond the trading post established at Kerma, above
the Third Cataract. During the time of the New Kingdom (1550-1070 BCE), this
highway was in continuous use all the way throughout the Roman Era, as many
inscriptions on the Rock of Offerings at Sunt(Elephantine) testify.
There were
also several trade routes to the Red Sea from the Nile Valley, which allowed
trade with Asian countries. Some of these ports along the Red Sea were:
Suakin, Massawa, and Zeila. The whole African continent was known to the
people of Egypt, as confirmed by Herodotus, who reported that Necho, King of
Egypt, c. 600 BCE, sent an Egyptian ship with Phoenician sailors to
circumnavigate Africa, and that they returned safely and reported of their
endeavor.
Outline
|